[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [xtm-wg] RE: XTM-UCS progress
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~> GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates of 2.9% Intro or 9.9% Ongoing APR* and no annual fee! Apply NOW! http://click.egroups.com/1/7872/4/_/337252/_/967722869/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> Hi Ann, I think of the forms basis as a means to obtain input from the wider community. I certainly don't feel that forms or XML are necessary to collect the data. I do concur that we should move on here. I believe that we should post a closing call for the survey and, as you have kindly offered, move on. I am concerned that the examples we have may prove quite biased in terms of the XTM community. What are your feelings here? Would you be interested in a closing call that set the final date as midnight Friday, September 1st, GMT? Would you rather begin and take any new responses that arrive as you work? -bryan -----Original Message----- From: Wrightson, Ann [mailto:Ann.Wrightson@sweetandmaxwell.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 4:40 AM To: Bryan Thompson Subject: XTM-UCS progress Bryan... I am getting really worried that the current survey-technology obsession in UCS is taking over the time available to make good use of what usecase information we have obtained. We got some responses - most v. brief, but neverthless an interesting sample, & some which could be usefully elaborated into full OMG-style usecases (much better use of time than any CGIs or forms...). I wanted to start analysing what we had asap, hence my offer. "Collation" - which can be done (in my experience in requirements analysis) very effectively in a few hours with basic technology, i.e. paper printout, highlighter pens and a keyboard (or as I do it, voice entry) - is now becoming a technology-development exercise with forms etc being developed. I think this is dangerously pointless. Unless XTM-UCS can get some coherent conclusions from usecases feeding into the other XTM groups very soon, XTM-UCS will be pointless. I hope you agree... Ann W. To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC