Re: [xtm-wg] Digest Number 109

[Dave Pawson <daveP@dpawson.freeserve.co.uk>]

>Martin:
>The real question is how this should be expressed in XML, where link entries are handled using href attributes. A much better approach here would be:
>
><assoc type="married" xlink:type="extended">
>     <husband xlink:type="locator" href="mypath[id='George234']" >George</husband>
>     <wife xlink:type="locator" href="mypath[id='Matilda123']">Matilda</wife>
></assoc>


I'd do with that... except for the fact that I'm still 'invalid', since
husband & wife are hardly to be expected in the DTD!
I *do* want compliance with a simple DTD... but I also want 
semantics that makes sense as Tim said, to the human element.

Issue remaining? How to align Martins/my suggestion with a DTD
<grin>and incorporate Elliotes indirection</grin>

Regards DaveP>


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
Dial 1-800-555-TELL -- You Won't Believe Your Ears!
For more details, click here:
http://click.egroups.com/1/9537/4/_/337252/_/971286065/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com