Re: [xtm-wg] Reification of topic map constructs

[Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>]

[srn]
> My understanding is that "node" is just vanilla CS jargon
> I personally don't want to create a new jargon term for this.  A node
> is a node, whether it's in a DOM tree or a topic map graph.  If the
> DOM is the only kind of graph a given person has ever encountered,
> then that person just needs to understand that DOM trees are not the
> only kinds of graphs in the world.

Fair enough. This becomes a documentation (and exposition) issue.

S.

=====
<?-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life."
     - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations -->

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/337252/_/973707548/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com