RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a T M yield one graph, or several?)

[Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>]

which other packaging mechanism did you have in mind?

unless defined otherwise, other packaging mechanisms can possibly have stuff
other than topic maps in them. the interchange package can't because we've
said that it can't.

P

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Hunting [mailto:sam_hunting@yahoo.com]
Sent: 09 November 2000 15:23
To: xtm-wg@egroups.com
Subject: RE: grove plans (off-topic; was: Re: [xtm-wg] Does processing a
T M yield one graph, or several?)



--- Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com> wrote:
> sorry, let me try that again
> in this case the reason that springs to mind is: so that I can
> unambiguously
> pack more than one serialization of a topic map from a particular
> **legal**
> namespace
> into a single interchange doc should I so wish to do. and I think I
> will
> want to...

But why an interchange *doc* as opposed to some other packaging
mechanism?

S.

=====
<?-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life."
     - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations -->

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/


To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/1/_/337252/_/973783982/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com