RE: [xtm-wg] Promotion of Conceptual Model

["Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com>]

> I think it is critical that the model be in the main part of the
> spec. This,
> as steve said, is the isness, the essence of what XTM is. It anambiguously
> conveys what the syntax represents.

We still need to get a clear prose explanation of the model, which fully
expresses
the "unambiguousness" and the exact relation with all pieces of the syntax.
This is what we are expecting you to provide to us. The UML slides are not
enough.
We need more explanations, to make this available to a wider audience than
the
XTM group.

We'll have to deal with the "self-explanatory" character of the syntax
until we get this written down. We'll publish whatever we would have been
able to get
and review in 15 days from now.

Michel
==========================================
Michel Biezunski, InfoLoom
Tel +33 1 44 59 84 29 Cell +33 6 03 99 25 29
Email: mb@infoloom.com  Web: www.infoloom.com
==========================================


-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/337252/_/974364993/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com