[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] Nomination for a new AG member -- Bernard Vatant
+1 on Bernard Vatant for membership in the AG. What? Not verdict first and voting later? ;-) Patrick Jack Park wrote: > I wish to take this opportunity to nominate Bernard Vatant for membership in > the AG. Bernard brings to this group strong interest and knowledge related > to Topic Maps. Indeed, he is involved in web projects that will ultimately > showcase TM technology. > > As it turns out, Jean Delahousse suggested that he ask for a nomination, and > I have taken the initiative to do that (sorry Jean, I bet you were about to > do that yourself). I now quote from Bernard's email to me his statements > regarding the strength of his interest in XTM. > > >Anyway, it seems that some of the reflexions I've brought are considered > >useful at least by Jean and you, and maybe some others. So, considering I > >am to apply for good, I suppose I should stress the following points : > > > >A long-ago concern and action in "pedagogy of concepts", both in maths and > >in history of sciences. > >A will and supposed capacity to build pedagogic communication tools for the > >promotion of the spec, based on the above background (I'm working on it at > >the moment) > >A conviction, that I think you share, that the XTM is bound to become a > >pervasive tool in knowledge representation and building, not only for Web > >applications but for teachers and students, and my will to work in this > >direction. > >A hunch that there is still much room for conceptual reflexion and > >clarification, even if the core of the spec is delivered, e.g. the status > >of AssociationsSubjects, and statements about these subjects. > >My persisting concern, even if it's somehow on standby these days, about > >contributive Web projects, and the way to use XTM tools for that matter. > > I therefore officially offer this nomination. I look forward to a second > and sufficient votes, preferably without the use of punched cards :-) Since > I am not much of a parliamentarian, I'll just volunteer to count the votes > if that's appropriate. Someone else will have to decide what constitutes a > winning count. > > Jack Park > > > ============================================================================ > This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may > contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not > the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies > of the message and its attachments and notify postmaster@verticalnet.com > immediately. > ============================================================================ > > > To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com > > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com -- Patrick Durusau Director of Research and Development Society of Biblical Literature pdurusau@emory.edu -------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~> eLerts It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free! http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/0/_/337252/_/976656866/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC