OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

topicmaps-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [xtm-wg] Nomination for a new AG member -- Bernard Vatant


After this clarification, I repeat my seconding of this proposal, and vote
for it.

Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Park [mailto:jackpark@verticalnet.com]
Sent: 13 December 2000 17:19
To: xtm-wg@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] Nomination for a new AG member -- Bernard Vatant


Dang!
I hate it when that happens :(
Sam, you're right on both counts.
May I ammend my comment that I wish to propose Bernard as an Invited Guest?
Jack

From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>

> [jack writes]
> > I therefore officially offer this nomination.  I look forward to a
> > second and sufficient votes, preferably without the use of punched 
> > cards :-) Since I am not much of a parliamentarian, I'll just 
> > volunteer to count the votes if that's appropriate.  Someone else
> will
> > have to decide what constitutes a winning count.
> 
> I don't want to be a grinch (French readers: a mythical, evil beast
> that "stole" Christmas) but I would like Eric Freese (our
> parliamentarian) to rule on the following points:
> 
> (1) A minor point: In Montreal, the AG voted that "Consideration of
> applications for Participating Membership will be deferred until after
> December 2000." (http://www.doctypes.org/xtm/org/minutes20000823.html).
> This is 2000-12-12. Does that matter? If it does, how do we change it?
> 
> (2) A major point: the bylaws (section 3.5.2, at
> www.topicmaps.org/org/XTM-charter-final-20000610.html) specify that "To
> be considered for Participating Membership, a person must have actively
> participated in the two preceding face-to-face TopicMaps.Org AG
> meetings in their entirety, or have previously served as a
> Participating Member." Does Bernard qualify under 3.5.2? If not, Jack,
> you might clarify what membership status you propose for Bernard.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> S.
> 
> P.S. Jack, I want to avoid a repeat of our Florida fiasco just as much
> as you do, and therefore I want to be crystal clear on process, here,
> in what is possibly our first e-mail vote on membership.



============================================================================
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not
the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies
of the message and its attachments and notify postmaster@verticalnet.com
immediately.
============================================================================



To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/0/_/337252/_/976729886/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC