Re: [xtm-wg] Re : Comments on XTM Spec 1.0

["Hans Holger Rath" <hhr@step.de>]

Hi Bernard,

You Vatant wrote:
> Hans wrote :
> 
> "A couple of people - and I am one of them - stated that association should
> have a name (<baseName>) and occurrences
> (<occurrence>) as child elements."

You "sniped" away the important part of my posting:
 "... The answer to that request
was: reification. This is an appropriate solution but it is
nowhere described in the XTM spec. There is 
http://www.doctypes.org/xtm/syntax/reification-syntax.html
but *the* solution is not marked in the document.
=> Please add information about reification to the spec with
an example that shows how names and occurrences can be "assigned"
to associations."

I am aware of the solutions you described in your reply
but I was looking for the - nailed down - technical 
solution (both in the processing model and in the syntax, 
means DTD). This is completely missing in the specs - at 
least I have not found something - but it has to be there
to answer these very important issues.

Cheers and have a nive weekend,
--Holger

-- 
H. Holger Rath <holger.rath@empolis.com>
empolis Content Management GmbH
Technologiepark, Pav. 7, 97222 Rimpar, Germany
http://www.empolis.com/ -- mobile: +49.172.66.90.427
phone: +49.9365.8062.63 -- fax: +49.9365.8062.66

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com