RE: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint

["Michel Biezunski" <mb@infoloom.com>]

[Steve Pepper:]
> In other words: Let non-merging be the default. Smart applications
> can always offer baseName-based merging as an additional service.

I agree that merging should not be automatic using the topic naming
constraint.
I have not the impression that this had been the case until now. It is an
incentive
for applications, but not more. The subject-based merging rule is much
stronger
because of the absolute value of subject identity points.

Unless I didn't get the point, I don't see any incompatibility between what
you
want and what we have. Probably we should clarify the text in order to
remove
any possible ambiguities.

Michel
==========================================
Michel Biezunski, InfoLoom
Tel +33 1 44 59 84 29 Cell +33 6 03 99 25 29
Email: mb@infoloom.com  Web: www.infoloom.com
==========================================


To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com