Re: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document

["Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>]

Daniel posted several times CM
diagrams and descriptions on this list.

Is there are a place where all the diagrams 
from CM group are collected together 
along with prose and comments?
It would be very helpful  to have these 
kind of a resource available before the meeting.

Thanks,

Nikita.

-------------------------------------------------------
Nikita Ogievetsky, Cogitech Inc.
http://www.cogx.com
nogievet@cogx.com
(917)406-8734
Consultant in XML/XSLT/Xlink/TopicMaps
Cogito Ergo XML

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>
To: <xtm-wg@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [xtm-wg] Status of Core Deliverables document


> > [If you are not interested in process issues related to the
> > development of the XTM spec, feel free to ignore this posting.]
> 
> [steve pepper]
> > Several comments on this mailing list during the last couple of
> > weeks suggest that the syntax no longer accurately reflects the
> > model.
> > If that really is the case, then we absolutely must fix the problems,
> > even if that means changing the Dec 4 DTD in ways that are non-
> > backwards compatible.
> 
> Alternatively, the conceptual model could be altered.
> 
> This would be a good deal easier than altering the DTD, since (a) at
> least in my recollection, no vote was ever taken to approve the CM as
> presented, (b) that would invalidate no existing instances, and (c) the
> mandate given by the AG to the CM-group-that was in Montreal was very
> carefully stated so as not to imply that the syntax in no way
> "reflected" the CM. If it did so, development would not have been able
> to proceed in parallel. 
> 
> S.
> 
> 



To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com