OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

topicmaps-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] FW: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] Re: Working ontologies


Many thanks for cross posting this, Paul.  The Denham Grey's comments are
valuable and worthy of further discussion.
Jack
From: Paul Prueitt <bcngroup@erols.com>

> I thought that this was well done.  Any comments from the XTM community?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denham Grey [mailto:dgrey@iquest.net]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 9:36 AM
> To: kmci-Virtual-Chapter@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [kmci-Virtual-Chapter] Re: Working ontologies
>
>
> What the heck is an ontology???
>
> A (shared) expression of belief, an agreement on the terminology (and
> sometimes the meaning) for communication and action. Ontologies serve
> to bound discourse, facilitate communication within & across
> communities and networks, leverage action by gathering agreement
> around values, objects, the way things are and what is 'out there'
> that is important. Ontologies help to orientate new folks and act as
> the stores for key learnings & distinctions accumulated through
> experience. Ontologies have a large influence on identity and help
> with the tacit transfer of context. Ontologies IMO are desitined to
> become a very influential part of knowledge work.
>
> Why mess with ontology?
>
> The growing interest in object orientated technologies, eLearning
> objects, business objects, the rise of XML as an industry standard,
> growth of intranet content, instant communication via the web,
> dissatisfaction with search results, integration of disparate
> (legacy) data stores, greater emphasis on faster / better / cheaper
> in the marketplace, the emergence of virtual business, portals and
> verticals. Interest in knowledge work, greater attention to
> conceptualization, innovation and insights as key drivers of the
> knowledge economy.
>
> Ontologies hold promise for:
> 1) Providing a common language for different parties
> 2) Improving communications through sharing meaning and raising
> social capital
> 3) Increasing alignment and leveraging self-organization via shared
> understanding
> 4) Providing an enterprise wide schema for intuitive navigation
> 5) Being able to leverage language as a tool
> 6) Helping communities of practice to improve their dialog and make
> key distinctions
> 7) Sparking innovation, helping to recognize emergent concepts and
> improving relationships, i.e. KM
>
> Key issues:
> a) Enforcement and evolution: to gain leverage you need buy-in, to
> gain innovation you need to change and experiment with the language,
> finding the right balance is key.
>
> b) Home grown vs. imported and adopted, or obtained and adapted:
> think of co-design, messing with folks values and beliefs, need for
> alignment. Advantages of unique distinctions vs. utility of wider
> communications.
>
> c) Natural practices or helped via tools: what tools should be
> selected and which representations supported?.
>
> d) Formal specification, inference and representation: somethings are
> best left fuzzy, told through stories or conceived via a metaphor,
> while formal ontologies allow machine processing, can be used by
> agents and can be more easily tested for completeness and circularity.
>
> e) From distinction to formal ontological level concept: when (at
> what stage) does an (individual) perception/ heuristic, value become
> an enterprise wide belief??
>
> f) Just how much energy should be devoted to this?, how much
> dissonance can be tolerated?
>
> g) Separate categories for navigation / browsing, vs. indexing /
> precision retrieval??
>
> h)Coming to terms with terms: categories, concepts, topics. Labels
> vs. objects themselves, capturing cathexis.
>
> This stuff goes way beyond classification to influencing
> organizational values and beliefs. Welcome to knowledge fundamentals.
>
> So what do you think? Are ontologies a part of your KM life yet!
>
> [Cross posted at Brint]



============================================================================
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not
the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies
of the message and its attachments and notify postmaster@verticalnet.com
immediately.
============================================================================


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/337252/_/981733234/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC