[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"
[eliot] > Or, WRT to my earlier response to this note, said another way: if > this > is the criteria, then Property Sets must also be eliminated because > they > absolutely have no formal mathematical constraint specification. Ah! That was my hidden agenda when I asked how portable the OMG's constraint language was. There's a lot to be said for angle brackets as opposed to "Drawrings" (as that sick sketch on SNL pronounced the word a decade or so ago...) -- all the usual things that can be said for them. From that aspect alone, property sets are attractive. Back to the data model/processing model question: where to property sets vs graphs fit into that? Is the property set the data model and the grove the processing model? S. ===== <!-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life." - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations --> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security? Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web Site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC