Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Lars Marius Garshol
|
| I do. If someone comes up with something graph-based that meets my
| concerns I will accept it. One of the things that will have to be
| addressed in order to achieve that is that the URIs of the nodes must
| be in the graph, but it is, I think, not inconceivable that that may
| happen.

* Sam Hunting
| 
| Lars, are you sure about this? 

Yes. Very much of what happens in a topic map is defined in terms of
the URIs, so there's no way around this.

| This could also go at the ASR level, not the graph level. 

If we have the ASR level, what do we want the graph level for?

| It seems to me that efficient storage is something that vendors
| might very well wish to compete on, and if so, they should be
| allowed to do do

Of course! Infosets, UML, property sets, EXPRESS etc do not affect
this at all.

--Lars M.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EVNB7A/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/