Re: [xtm-wg] Summary of PM discussion

[Geir Ove Grĝnmo <grove@ontopia.net>]

* Lars Marius Garshol
| The next step is perhaps for the participants in the debate to state
| their current positions, so that we can see if we need to discuss this
| any further, or whether we are sufficiently close to consensus that we
| can just make a decision and move forward.

My preferences are (in order of preference):

    infoset (descriptive)
  + UML (graphical) 
  + OCL (constraints)

I'd prefer to have all these three, where the infoset contains the
descriptions of the model. This model could also be visualized as UML
diagrams and the constrains on the model could be described using
OCL. This could happen without any of the three stepping on each others
toes.

- And I would very much prefer all this to glued together in a topic
map, so that "items" in the model, external resources and relationships
between "items" can be typed and named. This map could then be used for
all the purposes that I mentioned in an earlier mail.

Geir O.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EVNB7A/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/