Re: Multidimensional vs. One-dimensional info WAS Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Lars Marius Garshol
|
| There seems to be, yes. Where did all the URIs go? Where did the
| URIs of all nodes in the graph go? Where did the subject indicator
| URIs go?  Where did the subject address URIs go? Where did the
| occurrence and variant name resource URIs go?

* Thomas B. Passin
| 
| Whatever do you mean? They become values of nodes, possibly in their
| own nodes that are linked to parent nodes.

I know that, Tom. It's a rhetorical question. :-)  

The point is that while this is assumed it is nowhere _said_ in the
graph-based models. SRN's graph model only says that applications must
compare URIs intelligently to compute resource equality, while Sam's
unpublished graph model does not mention them at all. To me, this
makes both as they stand unusable.

| I don't see any problem with keeping hold of the URIs.

Nor is there one. :)  It's just that how to do it and how to use the
URIs that are in the model must be specified. Anything that is not
spelled out in detail must be interpreted, and will be interpreted in
different ways.

--Lars M.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/