Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

["Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>]

While I was composing this message, I got so many 
new e-mails in my inbox that 
got a little messed up with who said what ;-))

In brief I agree with James and Sam and sort-of disagree with 
Lars and Murray on the following:

I do not think that PM should be a tutorial on how to write programs.
I was always thinking that PM should be a model, just 
like CM, but on a lower level.
Sort of Assembler versus C++.
I do not know of any notation other then graph 
to represent PM clear and vendor-independently.

Strawman approach is nice as a start.
Tables are great as the middle solution.
Clear graph notation should be our outer goal.

Nikita.

----------------------------------------------------------
Nikita Ogievetsky               Cogitech Inc
XML/XSLT/XLink/TopicMaps   Consultant
nogievet@cogx.com   --   (917) 406-8734
http://www.cogx.com     Cogito Ergo XML

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/