Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

["Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>]

Lars, 

> Does this mean 'strawman' is nice, tables better, and that the best of
> all would be a clear graph model? If so, how do you think a graph
> model is better than an infoset-based approach? So far, nobody has
> said anything in answer to that last question.

I guess because nobody understands benefits of it.
(May be you can point them out?)
With regards to graph notation,
I know that it can be done,
it will be visually comprehensible,
and as Jean pointed out, it has been 
proven successful.
Plus we will create a bridge to RDF.

Nikita.

----------------------------------------------------------
Nikita Ogievetsky               Cogitech Inc
XML/XSLT/XLink/TopicMaps   Consultant
nogievet@cogx.com   --   (917) 406-8734
http://www.cogx.com     Cogito Ergo XML

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/