Re: [xtm-wg] core.xtm

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Eric Freese
| 
| I believe that extending 13250 to handle the explanation of XTM is
| the long-term goal, but for the short term, only the DTD is being
| added to 13250.  Something about ISO politics and process, I think.

That is my understand as well. (I was at the SC34 meeting in Berlin.)
 
| The current spec will be maintained by TopicMaps.Org (and possibily
| OASIS) until the text of 13250 becomes fully descriptive of XTM
| (assuming any ISO standard is fully descriptive ;-).

I know, but I think TopicMaps.Org would do well to sit very still in
the boat. If all this is going into ISO then TopicMaps.Org should IMHO
not do any further work on it.

--Lars M.


To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/