[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [topicmaps-comment] TAO vs. ERA
* Robert Barta | | This means that | | lars-marius (person) # using instanceOf here | | is an appropriate use of instanceOf and | | person (living-being) # also here | | is not? Exactly. | Then obviously the thinking to add <instanceOf> in the first place | | http://www.doctypes.org/xtm/syntax/Ontopia-syntax-comments.html#TOPIC | | was to facilitate 'down-stream' topic map authors, i.e. those who | already have an ontology around and should only fill this with | 'instances'. This wasn't the thinking at all, actually. It was just that the <instanceOf> element was so much simpler than a full-blown association, and for something that was used this often that was a big win. 99% of all topics are instances of a class, so it seemed strange to take away the shortcut that HyTM had for this. | And this means that ontologies should use a dedicated association of | type | | http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/1.0/#desc-class-instance | | ? Not in our minds. They should use it if they need to scope the class-instance relationship, which is not all that common, and if they don't they can just use <instanceOf>. --Lars M.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC