[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [topicmaps-comment] referring to a topic from outside a TM -- PURL
[Bandholtz, Thomas] See what just has been recommended by PubSubj: (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/recommendations/psdoc_ 04.htm) "4.4.1 - Every PS Indicator in a PS DocSet shall be identified by, and retrievable through an unique canonical URI. This canonical URI is the corresponding PS Identifier, uniquely defined in the PS DocSet namespace." Note: ***Every*** PS Indicator, not only the whole set. {Tom] I'm actually against making this mandatory, although it's good practice to do so when possible. Here's why: 1) Right now, anything retrievable through such a URI must be read and understood by a person, there is no topic maps mechanism to let a processor understand the "meaning" of the PSI. Being online does not seem to be an runtime requirement for processing, but rather a design time benefit for software and map creators. So any means by which a person can get the information should be ok. 2) It prevents people from creating useful PSIs if they don't have a stable website. 3) It would seem to invalidate previously PSIs whose web site goes away for some unfortunate reason, even when the copies of the information are available on many other web sites. 4) If technology were to change and so the owner of a set of PSIs were to want to host it using some other protocol or technology, they would not be able to make the change, since that would break the existing PSIs. For these reasons, I strongly suggest that it be a matter of good practice rather than mandate to have the PSIs be retrievable from their URI. Cheers, Tom P
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC