Re: [tosca] Proposal for requirement "occurrences"

[Tal Liron <tliron@redhat.com>]

Sorry, Chris, but this is getting tiresome for me and I'm sure everyone else is already bored.

As I said, I know you made all kinds of assumptions in order to answer the fuzzy parts of the spec "clearly" for yourself, and in the end came up with the idea of "dangling requirements". But I disagree with most of these assumptions. I've answered all of the points already.

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:28 PM Chris Lauwers <lauwers@ubicity.com> wrote:

In the real world, services will *always* depend on things that already exist, be they resources or components of other services that have been deployed previously.

Yes. And you do this via a node template and a graph relating your node templates. That's how you describe things, with models. A broken graph is a broken design.