[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-cmsc] XSD Derivation
Some kinds of derivation allowed in the XSD spec (restriction, substitution groups) are not universally implemented. If we left these out of consideration, and the question were just "Should XSD complex type extension be used...?", I could see an argument for doing that in an XSD-native way rather than performing a schema-to-schema transformation. But there may be costs to treating this kind of context rule differently from the others. In short, I'm with Eduardo on this one. :-) Eve At 04:18 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote: >2) Should XSD derivation be used when context rules are applied: always, >sometimes or never? In others, what is the derivation relationship, if any, >between contextual components and the base components that yielded them? -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC