[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components TechnicalSpecification v1.8
This message is prime example of a reason *not* to cross post topics like this. I am not subscribed to the ebtwg-ccs, so I did not see Ms. McCarthy's response and I won't see any others on that list. I'm sure there are others like me, and the reverse is true for folks on that list who are not on the UBL-comment list. I suggest that we kill this thread and open a new one on *one* list if anyone wants to continue this topic. At 09:57 PM 4/30/02 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote: >Conversely, why have a formal comment process if we can debate all issues >over the list(s) ;-) > ><mailto:melanie.mccarthy@gm.com>melanie.mccarthy@gm.com wrote: >> >>Tim, >> >>I would rather have more communication than less. Certainly by sharing >>this discussion topic it gave others' (potentially me) time to think about >>it and potentially pursue external discussions with participating UBL >>members. I also always have a choice to delete the message if I am not >>interested. But to expedite the development of these technical >>specifications, I prefer to hear am many points of view as possible - a >>believe that one of the opportunities present by list servers, is to >>quickly share communications with a large group of interested readers. I >>must say that I think this topic will be huge if/when presented as a >>comment to CCTS - so preparation and understand of the originators point of >>view is critical. >> >>My 2 cents! >>regards >> >>melanie mccarthy >> >> >> >> >> >>Tim McGrath <mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au><tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> >>on 04/30/2002 07:07:19 AM >> >>Please respond to <mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au >> >>To: Todd Boyle <mailto:tboyle@rosehill.net><tboyle@rosehill.net> >>cc: <mailto:mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com, >><mailto:ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, >> <mailto:ebtwg-ccs@lists.ebtwg.org>ebtwg-ccs@lists.ebtwg.org >>Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components >> Technical Specification v1.8 >> >> >>Todd, >> >>I must concur with Mike on this. In fact, I think it is confusing and >>counter-productive for you to redistribute UBL comments to the eBTWG >>lists for discussion. This is why we have a formal comments submissi >>on >>process. Groups like UBL need to get their thoughts together and >>present them formally to groups like eBTWG. >> >>UBL welcomes your comments and contribution to our discussion - but >>please dont waste the bandwidth of eBTWG list members. It only serves >>to add to the static interference. >> >> >> >><remainder of message removed>> >> >>> >>>. >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>. >> > > >-- >regards >tim mcgrath >fremantle western australia 6160 >phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 --------------------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC