[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components TechnicalSpecification v1.8
ebXML, UBL and other groups need a more modern collaboration platform than email. This platform gets in our way like this, *all the time*. This is unfortunate and avoidable. The need to manually decide to crosspost to adjacent communities, or stop crossposting, is archaic and artificial, respectfully, Todd At 07:05 AM 4/30/02, Michael C. Rawlins wrote: >This message is prime example of a reason *not* to cross post topics like >this. I am not subscribed to the ebtwg-ccs, so I did not see Ms. >McCarthy's response and I won't see any others on that list. I'm sure >there are others like me, and the reverse is true for folks on that list >who are not on the UBL-comment list. I suggest that we kill this thread >and open a new one on *one* list if anyone wants to continue this topic. > >At 09:57 PM 4/30/02 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote: >>Conversely, why have a formal comment process if we can debate all issues >>over the list(s) ;-) >> >><mailto:melanie.mccarthy@gm.com>melanie.mccarthy@gm.com wrote: >>> >>>Tim, >>> >>>I would rather have more communication than less. Certainly by sharing >>>this discussion topic it gave others' (potentially me) time to think about >>>it and potentially pursue external discussions with participating UBL >>>members. I also always have a choice to delete the message if I am not >>>interested. But to expedite the development of these technical >>>specifications, I prefer to hear am many points of view as possible - a >>>believe that one of the opportunities present by list servers, is to >>>quickly share communications with a large group of interested readers. I >>>must say that I think this topic will be huge if/when presented as a >>>comment to CCTS - so preparation and understand of the originators point of >>>view is critical. >>> >>>My 2 cents! >>>regards >>> >>>melanie mccarthy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Tim McGrath <mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au><tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> >>>on 04/30/2002 07:07:19 AM >>> >>>Please respond to <mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au >>> >>>To: Todd Boyle <mailto:tboyle@rosehill.net><tboyle@rosehill.net> >>>cc: >>><mailto:mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com, >>><mailto:ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, >>> <mailto:ebtwg-ccs@lists.ebtwg.org>ebtwg-ccs@lists.ebtwg.org >>>Subject: Re: [ubl-comment] UBL comments on ebXML Core Components >>> Technical Specification v1.8 >>> >>> >>>Todd, >>> >>>I must concur with Mike on this. In fact, I think it is confusing and >>>counter-productive for you to redistribute UBL comments to the eBTWG >>>lists for discussion. This is why we have a formal comments submissi >>>on >>>process. Groups like UBL need to get their thoughts together and >>>present them formally to groups like eBTWG. >>> >>>UBL welcomes your comments and contribution to our discussion - but >>>please dont waste the bandwidth of eBTWG list members. It only serves >>>to add to the static interference. >>> >>> >>> >>><remainder of message removed>> >>> >>>> >>>>. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>. >> >> >>-- >>regards >>tim mcgrath >>fremantle western australia 6160 >>phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 > >--------------------------------------------------------------- >Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting >www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC