Re: [ubl-dev] schematron cam ubl

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk>]

Bryan

Excellent idea, and others have voiced similar thoughts as they've sought to implement parts of UBL, but who would host it? Or rather, who *should* host it? It could obviously include other artifacts too, as a few others have suggested. To date we've tended to keep such things to private sites to which we can point with url's: it this still the best way for now?

Schematron seems to have to evolve rather than be created in a few steps so some system for version control might be important - though it could just be a naming/dating convention, perhaps the same as used for UBL Schema files.

Steve


>>> Bryan Rasmussen <brs@itst.dk> 23/12/04 08:50:53 >>>

Hi,
In working with the Danish implementation of UBL I've found that there are
often constraints required in a format that cannot be adequately defined
using xml schemas. I've been using schematron to do these. I understand that
CAM is also big in this area of additional constraints. Yesterday I had to
make an EAN location number checker (just implementing the algorithm,
obviously not checking to make sure it is an actual EAN number) using
schematron, which got me thinking that it might be beneficial to have a
repository for snippets of extra validation somewhere, both schematron and
CAM would be a good idea.