Re: [ubl-dev] Code list extensibility and substitution groups

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

David:

I CAM't believe you are stating this.  It CAMe to my attention that CAM 
beCAMe your solution to everything long before I overCAMe my fear of 
schema.  If you CAM explain it more clearly however, others CAM 
understand it better.  While some think it is a sCAM, I find it 
sCAMdelous that it's merits are not well understood.

Perhaps you should grab your CAMera and take photos of CAM in action 
solving CAM related problems.  If you succeed, they will CAMp outside 
your doorstep waiting for copies.

;-)

Duane 

David Webber (XML) wrote:

>Duane,
>
>If only it were that simple - schema implementation nuances
>are subject to communities of interpretation.  One man
>argues for a behaviour - the other the opposite.
>
>It is what it is - and the issue is that schema use cases
>do not include these B2B integration ones - so you are
>using this stuff out-of-band.
>
>That was the primary design impetus behind CAM in
>the first place - the realization that we are just solving
>a different set of needs and customers.
>
>DW
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
>To: "William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@novannet.com>
>Cc: <ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
>Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 2:35 PM
>Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] Code list extensibility and substitution groups
>
>
>  
>
>>William:
>>
>>I wish I could state I had an answer but I don't.  There are a number of
>>approaches and, as you have noted, each has benefits and drawbacks.
>>Flexibility vs. non- interoperate-ability seems to be a persistent issue.
>>
>>One thing I would promote however, is to solve the problem then worry
>>about the implementation issues.  If Xerces should support something yet
>>doesn't, it should be noted and forwarded to the Apache project.
>>
>>Duane
>>
>>William J. Kammerer wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>An honest to goodness XML and schema expert!  Welcome, Duane!  Thanks
>>>for writing in. So how should code list extensibility (Req. 26) be done,
>>>without resulting in a "rat's-nest" of schemas and overrides?  Even my
>>>little example for restricting currencies to preferred types (excluding
>>>the CAD), which works under XMLSpy, breaks down using Xerxes and SAX.
>>>And then when you fuss with namespaces, bases, import, includes and
>>>redefines, it will work for Xerxes, but is broken for XMLSpy!
>>>
>>>CAM anyone?
>>>
>>>William J. Kammerer
>>>Novannet
>>>Columbus, OH 43221-3859 . USA
>>>+1 (614) 487-0320
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
>>>Cc: <ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org>
>>>Sent: Monday, 21 February, 2005 11:14 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] Code list extensibility and substitution groups
>>>
>>>
>>>CAD = Bad currency??  Who is running up a deficit of $2.2 billion per
>>>day - eh?
>>>
>>>http://brillig.com/debt_clock/
>>>
>>>The only possible justification for this would be if you used some of
>>>the money to cull the NHL players strike so we could watch decent ice
>>>hockey again.
>>>
>>>;-)
>>>
>>>Duane A. A. Nickull
>>>
>>>***********
>>>Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
>>>Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
>>>Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  -
>>>http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
>>>***********
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>-- 
>>***********
>>Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
>>Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
>>Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  -
>>    
>>
>http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
>  
>
>>***********
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********