[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-dev] How to handle the case of returned checks
Thank you for your detailed answer. The customer will probably send another payment for the returned check, along with a new UBL Remittance Advice? So we'll end up receiving 2 remittance advices for the same invoices, isn't it a problem? Eric. On 12/21/2010 9:20 AM, Roberto Cisternino wrote: > Hi, > you are in the borders of UBL. > When you send an UBL Remittance advice it means you have made a payment > initiation on the banking channel (e.g. credit transfer) so you can't do > nothing with UBL as it is an issue solved by the banking channel. > > UBL remittance is just an advice that is precious to have an easy and > complete reconciliation between payments and invoices. > > The match is quite complex as the Supplier/Invoicer (Creditor) should > match the following documents/messages: > > - The "Credit Transfer notification" received by the banking channel > containing one or more End-to-End references, the same specified into the > UBL remittance Advice. (this is performed after the payment initiation if > all the payment process is ok in the clearing system) > > - The "UBL Remittance Advice" received from the Buyer/Debtor (with same > End-to-end identifiers, see upper) > > - The Invoice/s issued against the Buyer in reference. > NOTE: The end-to-end identifier/s are generated by the Invoicer and > provided on either the Invoice header or even in the line items. Later > the same identifiers are asked to be used by the debtor on the > remittance advice and in the payment initiation. > The banking (clearing system) should safely transport such end-to-end > identifiers til the end and thus inside the Credit Transfer notification. > > -- > So, the UBL Remittance Advice playes an impotant role as it is the > connection between all these messages and facilitates the reconciliation. > > If the Invoicer/creditor do not receives a Credit Transfer Notification or > even receives another more specific negative response, the UBL Remittance > will be still useful to provide somo more information on the use case, but > payment issues are up to the banking system. > > Hope this helps, > > Best regards > > Roberto Cisternino > > JAVEST CEO > UBL ITLSC co-chair > >> Some payment receipts by checks from customers may not be processed by >> the bank for various reasons such as insufficient funds. How can we >> handle these cases? >> >> Would it make sense to send a remittance advice with a negative amount >> to the customer's accounting department? >> >> Sincerely, >> Eric Desgranges >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org >> >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]