[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Aligning 'address' with CIQ xAL
Tim, I am partial to the way we have it now. I think that as long as xAL is mappable to what we have things should be ok... ____________________ Alan Stitzer Technical Analyst Marsh USA Inc. 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-2774 Phone: (561) 743-1938 Fax: (561) 743-1993 Internet: Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com ____________________ <<< Memo from tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au@Internet on 22 October, 2002, 12:34:44 PM Tuesday >>> tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au@Internet on 22 Oct 2002, 12:34 Tuesday To: ubl-lcsc cc: (bcc: Alan Stitzer) Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Aligning 'address' with CIQ xAL The attached spreadsheet shows the current way we model addresses and contrasts this with the way the OASIS CIQ xAL vocabulary would express the same components. The question to the group is do we wish to introduce the necessary structures to align ourselves more tighly to xAL or remain with our legacy view fro xCBL? -- regards tim mcgrath fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 (See attached file: normalized components address using xAL.xls) To: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org@Internet cc: (bcc: CN=Alan Stitzer/OU=NYC-NY/OU=US/OU=Marsh/O=MMC) From: tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au@Internet
Attachment:
normalized components address using xAL.xls
Description: application/msexcel
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC