Fw: [ubl-ndrsc] Core Components Context Constraints Language

["Lisa Seaburg" <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>]

I forgot to put LCSC on the address list.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lisa Seaburg" <lseaburg@aeon-llc.com>
To: "Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>; "Eduardo Gutentag"
<eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>
Cc: "UBL-NDR" <ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org>;
<ubl-cmsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Core Components Context Constraints Language


> We discussed this on today's NDRSC concall.  Our answer is:
>
> In the next phase we have always said we would implement this.  Basically
> our current extension methdology is predicated on the use of it in the
> future.   Eduardo agrees with this wholeheartedly.
>
> Lisa
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
> To: "Eduardo Gutentag" <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>
> Cc: "UBL-NDR" <ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org>;
> <ubl-cmsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 2:08 AM
> Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Core Components Context Constraints Language
>
>
> > I am drafting the UBL response to the CCTS Implementation Verification
> > and need some input on the Core Components Context Constraints Language
> > (section 6.2.4 of the CCTS).
> >
> > Is it appropriate to say we intend to implement this?
> >
> > --
> > regards
> > tim mcgrath
> > phone: +618 93352228
> > postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160
> >
> >
> >
>