[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] xsd:documentation vs xsd:appinfo
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, CRAWFORD, Mark wrote: >>We are under no obligation to use a particular feature of XSD, >>only to use XSD. We have made many decisions regarding the >>appropriateness of using certain features - that is what NDR is >>all about. Many of those decisions were also reviewed, re-decided, deprecated and expanded. I'm not sure sometimes certain decisions made are the most corret, but we go along anyway. But some are just plain irky -- that's what the debate is all about. Why <documentation> then? >>Exactly. And we, as NDR determined that the right thing >>was to avoid the use of AppInfo to ensure broadest market >>appeal. I have a business case that says that we will >>loose part of our audience if we include normative AppInfo >>in our schema. I'm sure it has been appropriately assessed then that that single business case represents more than 80% of the world's estimated market for business.... Thanks. Best Regards, Chin Chee-Kai SoftML Tel: +65-6820-2979 Fax: +65-6743-7875 Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net http://SoftML.Net/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]