[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Proposed changes to column heading/core componentparamters/ metadata
Michael,We should call it what it is - a datatype qualifier. Of course wherever used, it should result in a specialised datatype being defined in the sdt schema module.Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dill [mailto:dill2@gefeg.com]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 4:48 AM
To: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: AW: [ubl-lcsc] Proposed changes to column heading/core component paramters/ metadata
Tim,we need a Qualifier, independent whether we call it Representation Term Qualifier or Data Type Qualifier.
Michael
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. März 2004 09:51
An: Stephen Green
Cc: ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org
Betreff: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Proposed changes to column heading/core component paramters/ metadata
we obvious need occurrence in the models, but you are correct it will appear in schemas as minOccurs/maxOccurs in the schemas.
I should have been more clear, these things will appear in the documentation part of the schema. I suggest we still have occurrence in the Core Component Parameters schema and leave it to the schema generator to decide if to use it. in the case of UBL we would say - don't use it. But at least it is there if wanted. It would also be harder to specify what was to be in the models only!
I have also noted that somehow a thing called "QualifierDataType" crept into this. I would like to call this just "DataType". any comments?
I would like to brief TTSc with these today - so please speak up or we shall assume consensus.
Stephen Green wrote:
Tim I especially like that we include "Examples". Do we need "Occurance" though (since this should be evident from the Schema)? Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim McGrath" <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au> To: <ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 5:33 PM Subject: [ubl-lcsc] Proposed changes to column heading/core component paramters/ metadataIn trying to synchronise the names for metadata, i want to propose we adopt the following terms.. "DictionaryEntryName" "ObjectClassQualifier" "ObjectClass" "PropertyTermQualifier" "PropertyTermPossessiveNoun" "PropertyTermPrimaryNoun" "RepresentationTerm" "QualifierDataType" "AssociatedObjectClassQualifier" "AssociatedObjectClass" "AlternativeBusinessTerms" "ComponentType" "Occurrence" "Definition" "Examples" Can i get any comments on these a.s.a.p. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster ofthe OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgrou p.php.To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgroup.php.
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]