[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] qualified vs unqualified local elements
As I begin gathering arguments regarding local vs global element declarations, and unqualified vs qualified local elements, I reviewed several very, very long threads of discussion on xml-dev during August 2001. I'll summarize the recommendations in a position paper, but for those who are interested in more detail... (Kelly, can you provide a pointer to the thread you mentioned regarding complexType restriction and local elements?) The core arguments for why local elements are part of XSD (and why they should be unqualified) is contained in these four messages: An initial explanation of qualified vs unqualified local elements: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200108/msg00654.html http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200108/msg00744.html Explains two uses cases for why similar functionality was added to SOX, which influenced XSD: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200108/msg00939.html Read the quoted message at the end before reading the reply on this one: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200108/msg00993.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC