Re: [ubl-ndrsc] proposed split

[Mike Rawlins <mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>]

Looks good to me.

"CRAWFORD, Mark" wrote:

>
>
>        1. Interchange and Application Use - UBL is intended for
>           interchange and application use
>
>       2. Tool use and support - The design of UBL cannot make any
> assumptions about sophisticated tools for creation, management,
> storage, or presentation being available. .  The lowest common
> denominator for tools is incredibly low (for example, Notepad), and
> the variety of tools used is staggering. We do not see this situation
> changing in the near term.
>
> Mark
>

--
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com