|
Dave,
Right. We assumed
the root element was outside the bounds of the diagram, but I can see we need to
caveat.
Thanks,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Carlson
[mailto:dcarlson@ontogenics.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 5:51
PM
To: 'UBL Design Rules (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc]
Schema Design Flow
The diagram is helpful, thanks. But one
nitpick, I don't see how the final branch "All local" can be possible.
You always need at least one global element to represent the document
root. So an extreme case would be that the document root exposes the
instance namespace, but all child elements are written without a namespace
prefix (unqualified local elements).
Dave
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 6:57
AM
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Schema Design
Flow
To all,
I have noticed that as we
discuss the various features of schema, we seem to struggle at times to
remember which features are compatible, at least I know that I certainly
do. To help me keep it all straight, I asked two of my developers -
Joe Chiusano and Jessica Glace - to put together a flowchart that shows all
the interdependencies of the various features. Although they are still
just getting started on this, I wanted to share with you what they have done
so far since it seems to apply to our discussions, and may also be something
we want to put in our design document.
Mark
<<SchemaDesignFlow.pdf>>
|