Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Dale's work on the legal issues text

[Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@sun.com>]

Dale said that there is a need for a clear specification in UBL that the
schema-validated instance will always be taken to be the definitive document.

I'm not sure that'd be enough; I think two normative statements would
be needed.

- All UBL-compliant document instances MUST contain information about the
location and version (if the latter is relevant) of the schema to be used
to validate said document

- Only the infoset produced by document validation is canonical wrt said
document

Or, alternatively, one normative sentence would to the trick ;-)

- No defaulted attributes are allowed in UBL schemas.


Eve L. Maler wrote:

> 
>> From: "McKay, Dale R." <DMCKAY@northropgrumman.com>
>> To: "'Eve L. Maler'" <eve.maler@sun.com>
>> Subject: Defaults
>> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 08:14:31 -0800
>> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
>>
>> Here's a draft of Section A9. As noted, I really didn't have enough to 
>> go on
>> from our legal authority, so have winged it to a considerable extent.
>> Comments?
>>
>> -Dale
>>
>>
> -- 
> Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
> Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com
> DefaultDetails.doc
> 
> Content-Type:
> 
> application/msword
> Content-Encoding:
> 
> BASE64
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.3
> 
> Content-Type:
> 
> text/plain
> 
> 


-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
XML Technology Center          |         Phone:  (510) 986-3651 x73651
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |