[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: version 2 UBL Feedback to CCTS 1.8
3CC39E75.7090506@portcomm.com.au"> Bill
I am pulling together a fairly comprehensive summary of the NDR and LCSC comments.
I have a comment on Arofan's RT/CCT proposal. It appears that the newly acquired Content and Supplementary Components of the CCTS (table 8-2 on page 87) may be the way they intend to address the issue of things like price precision vs. amounts. i.e. a syntax-independent yet solid physical representation of data. Does anyone else see that, or have I missed something?
Burcham, Bill wrote:
40AC2C8FB855D411AE0200D0B7458B2B07344DA7@scidalmsg01.csg.stercomm.com">Attached is version 2 of the NDRSC feedback document to Core Components Technical Specification 1.8.This version has an updated CC meta-model (diagram) and includes Arofan's RT/CCT feedback (hope you don't mind Arofan -- I snarfed it off the portal).Regards,Bill
ccts-comments-ubl-0-2.zip
Content-Type:application/octet-stream Content-Encoding:base64
--
regards
tim mcgrath
fremantle western australia 6160
phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
-- regards tim mcgrath fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
Attachment:
UBL comments on CCTS.doc
Description: MS-Word document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC