[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Re: SQUIRTS, CCTS feedback and "Primitive Types"
40AC2C8FB855D411AE0200D0B7458B2B073452E2@scidalmsg01.csg.stercomm.com">There was an error in the metamodel presented in our CCTS 1.8 feedback (v 5.2). At the end of section 2 on page 7 we show BCC related to Primitive Type through BCCProperty. That was wrong because it fails to distinguish the 1-1 relationship between a BCC and it's "content component". A better model is shown here (inline and attached as PDF):In this model we explicitly show the distinguished relationship between BCC and its content component (of meta-class "Primitive Type"). The association role "contentComponent" captures this special relationship explicitly. This model retains the BCCProperty to relate the BCC to its supplementary components -- each of which needs to be named in relation to the BCC.Arofan -- do I understand SQUIRTS right, that a SQUIRT is essentially what I've shown as a "PrimitiveType" in the diagram.So that's two issues:1. we added an association directly from BCC to PrimitiveType for the content component2. we might need to change the metaclass PrimitiveType to SQUIRTThoughts?-Bill
-- regards tim mcgrath fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
Attachment:
meta-model.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC