[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] New rule for property term
Dear all we agreed that we need a new naming rule for property term. See an excerpt from the minutes below. I think we should try to formulate something today. As I have not bee on these calls I am a little cold as far as understanding goes. Thanks Mavis We agreed that we need a new rule for how to name the property term when its contents are a series of like items. We agreed that the ordered/unordered distinction is not particularly important, so we discarded the option of using the word "Set" at all. Our understanding is that multiple qualifiers are going to be allowed under the new CCTS situation. Straw poll: property qualifier property term comments (preferred, acceptable) ListOf LineItem The term is false in this case ListOf LineItems Qualifier stuff too complicated ListOfLineItem p=1 a=0 ListOfLineItems p=0 a=2 LineItemList p=5 a=2 We have a winner! LineItems p=0 a=4 LineItemsList p=0 a=0 We discussed whether LineItemList should use "List" as the term and "LineItem" (or whatever) as the qualifier, but decided that a "naked list" as a object class's property is just too vague a notion. Some examples: Order.LineItemList.Details Item.SubstituteItemIdentifierList.Details Item.PhysicalAttributeList.Details
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC