Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Recursive container?

[Chin Chee-Kai <cheekai@softml.net>]

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Chin Chee-Kai wrote:

>>Question:
>>
>>When 2 or more containers end up sitting consecutively in
>>a complexType, should there be a container applied onto the
>>list of containers themselves?
>>
>>Ie.  in the situation as follows:
>>
>>    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeA>...</SomeTypeA></UBLContainer>
>>    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeB>...</SomeTypeB></UBLContainer>
>>    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeC>...</SomeTypeC></UBLContainer>
>>
>>should the list of <UBLContainer>s be recursively contained
>>as in:
>>
>><UBLContainer>...</UBLContainer>
>>    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeA>...</SomeTypeA></UBLContainer>
>>    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeB>...</SomeTypeB></UBLContainer>
>>    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeC>...</SomeTypeC></UBLContainer>
>><UBLContainer>...</UBLContainer>
>>
>>?

Sorry, for the last example, I meant it to show:

<UBLContainer>
    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeA>...</SomeTypeA></UBLContainer>
    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeB>...</SomeTypeB></UBLContainer>
    <UBLContainer><SomeTypeC>...</SomeTypeC></UBLContainer>
</UBLContainer>

and ask whether this is the way Containers should be applied
or otherwise.  Hope it wasn't confusing.  Thanks.



Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
http://SoftML.Net/