Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 114 Notations

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

Is there also a need for a  statement about the use of DTD declarations in 
our schemas for things like entities?

I'm assuming this rule is here because it really requires the use of the 
DTD to declare the NOTATION in the first place.

..dan


At 10:34 AM 7/16/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 23, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 114]  Notations MUST NOT be used.
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>
>
>---
>
>File has not been scanned
>
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003