Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 93 Processing Instructions

[Dan Vint <dvint@acord.org>]

I've got more of a why question on this one. Eve covered the 
Schema/Instance use side, but what if I want to use the Stylesheet PI to 
indicate how my document should be formatted? This is how they set that 
spec up and I would see where people might want to use that one 
specifically in the data stream.

I would hope the surrounding text gives me a reason why, other than just 
because. This certainly might be an eaiser way to incorporate some trading 
partner agreements and still use the off the shelf UBL schema.

..dan

At 10:34 AM 7/16/2003 -0500, Lisa-Aeon wrote:
>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>
>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>
>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
>
>*******************************
>[R 93]  Processing Instructions MUST NOT be used.
>
>
>
>ATG Decision:  ACCEPTED.
>
>
>---
>
>File has not been scanned
>
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003