Re: [ubl-psc] UBL Catalogue requirements for the textile and apparelindustry

[JAVEST <roberto@javest.com>]

Thanks,
we will work on this soon.

Also we have some more inputs about Collections of Items, but I am still 
thinking the way we can solve this.

In a given Catalog there could be many different Collections of Items.  
This concept is common to many industrial sectors like ceramics, 
apparel, textile, ...

I though we cannot change the way is structured the Catalogue line items 
but maybe we could add a Collections (0..n) to be used under those 
situations.

I'll send you more details soon.

Regards

Roberto


Tim McGrath ha scritto:
> see below...
>
> JAVEST wrote:
>> Dear PSC,
>> our primary UBL ITLSC member ENEA has a long experience into the 
>> textile supply chain and they are promoting and implementing the UBL 
>> Catalogue.
>>
>> Please find below a set of requirements for the UBL Catalogue 2.0:
>>
>> 1. It is required to associate 1 or more pictures to show the item or 
>> parts of it.
>>
>>    I proposed to use the attachment for this purpose:
>>    
>> Catalogue->CatalogueLine->Item->ItemSpecificationDocumentReference->Attachment 
>>
>>
> this is possible and would be considered as an implementation profile 
> rule.
>> 2. For a given item it is required to specify a set of variations 
>> (e.g. A T-Shirt is available on different colors: white, black, red, 
>> ... but also there are two different embroiders variations)
>>
>>    I proposed:
>>    Catalogue->CatalogueLine->Item->AdditionalItemIdentification
>>
> as above, this is possible and would be considered as an 
> implementation profile rule.
>> 3. About the "Brand":
>>    The brand name seems to be not sufficient for the textile and 
>> apparel industry.
>>    These are the additional data that could expand the Brand element:
>>    - Brand Logo
>>    - Description
>>    - Code
>>    - Market (the target market/s for this brand)
>>
>>    NOTE: A new Brand aggregate should be required for both the Item 
>> level and Document level.
>>                At the document level a Brand could be expressed as a 
>> default for all items.
>>
> This can be considered as part of the UBL 2.1 package. I agree that as 
> a Brand can be used for many items its properties should be a separate 
> ABIE.  But it needs some more detailed design, with some definitions 
> and examples.  Perhaps create a sample spreadsheet entry for this?
> At the document level we can qualify the ASBIE as being "Default".
> We also have a small problem with how we deal with the existing 
> BrandName BBIE within Item.
>
>
>>
>> For further discussions on this argument please reply to both me and 
>> Arianna Brutti.
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your evaluations
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Roberto Cisternino
>> Arianna Brutti (ENEA)
>>
>> UBL ITLSC co-chairs
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs 
>> in OASIS
>> at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>