Hi Joao
UBL 2.1 is still open for request. But right now we are in a
process of publishing 2.1 for public review. If we stop that process and update
the schemas It will cause further delay. Is it acceptable for you that we take
this as input for the review process even when it has not started yet?
Best regards
Peter
Fra: Joao Frade
[mailto:joao.frade@pwc.be]
Sendt: 5. maj 2010 23:29
Til: plb@ebconnect.dk; tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com
Cc: 'Andy Schoka (E-mail)'; 'Ole Ellerbæk Madsen'; plb@ebconnect.dk;
tim.mcgrath@documentengineeringservices.com; ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
Emne: Re: eview of schemas, meeting in the PSC Tuesday the 23rd of March
15 CET
Hi Peter, Hi
Tim, Hi everyone,
I hope that
this email finds you well.
I am coming
back to you on the issue which I have reported two months ago on the inclusion
of the VersionID in the DocumentReferenceType.
After further
implementation work, we have noticed that the same issue happens in the
“AttachedDocument”. We currently have the possibility to specify
the “ParentDocumentID” and the “ParentDocumentTypeCode”
but we should equally have the possibility to indicate the
“ParentVersionID”. This element should of course be optional.
Additionally,
we would also like to have the possibility to specify in the
“AttachedDocument” a “LineID” or “ItemID”
so that attachments can be added to a specific item e.g. in the Catalogue. This
element should also be optional.
Please let me
know if these comments can still be taken onboard. They are very important for
e-PRIOR.
Thank you
very much.
Best regards,
João
|
|
|
|
Joao Frade | Manager
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers* Performance Improvement Consulting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joao
Frade/BE/GRM/PwC 24/03/2010
18:44 |
|
Hi Peter,
I would like to inform you that
we found a glitch in the “DocumentStatusRequest”. It is in fact an
issue which we came across when implementing e-Catalogue.
There are documents which are
not subject to versioning e.g. the Invoice but for some others the version is
actually almost mandatory e.g. Catalogue.
Therefore, the versionID should
be included as optional element in the DocumentReferenceType.
What do you think?
Sorry for the late comment, I
hope that you can still take it onboard.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
João
Joao Frade | Manager
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers* Performance Improvement Consulting
Woluwe Garden - Woluwedal 18 | B-1932
Sint-Stevens-Woluwe | www.pwc.be
Tel +32 2
7109284 | Fax +32 2 7107224 | Mobile +32 477 842292 | E-mail joao.frade@pwc.be
Please consider the impact on the environment before printing this e-mail
and/or the attachment(s).
*PricewaterhouseCoopers Enterprise Advisory cvba/scrl
Maatschappelijke zetel/Siège social: Woluwe Garden, Woluwedal 18, B-1932
Sint-Stevens-Woluwe
BTW/TVA BE 0415.622.333 RPR Brussel/RPM Bruxelles
ING 310-1381196-02
This legal entity is a member of the network of member firms of
PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent
legal entity
|
Joao
Frade/BE/GRM/PwC 23/03/2010
16:17 |
|
Hi Peter,
It was nice
talking with you today. As agreed, I am sending you my comments on the latest
release of the UBL schemas:
- As part of
the “AllowanceCharge” element we should have the possibility to
specify a “PerUnitAmount”. This would be an optional element which
when used would mean that the “Amount” of the “Allowance
Charge” is equal to the PerUnitAmount * the Quantity of Items at the
specific line level or, when used at the header level, the total number of
items.
- We should
be able to specify the Item’s warranty terms in the Order message. This
means that we should add the “WarrantyValidityPeriod” and perhaps
“WarrantyParty” to the Order Line.
Additionally,
the AttachedDocument is currently not included in the package distributed for
review.
Thank you
very much for your cooperation and support.
Please let me
know if you require additional information from me.
Best regards,
João
Joao Frade | Manager
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers* Performance Improvement Consulting
Woluwe Garden - Woluwedal 18 | B-1932
Sint-Stevens-Woluwe | www.pwc.be
Tel +32 2
7109284 | Fax +32 2 7107224 | Mobile +32 477 842292 | E-mail joao.frade@pwc.be
Please consider the impact on the environment before printing this e-mail
and/or the attachment(s).
*PricewaterhouseCoopers Enterprise Advisory cvba/scrl
Maatschappelijke zetel/Siège social: Woluwe Garden, Woluwedal 18, B-1932
Sint-Stevens-Woluwe
BTW/TVA BE 0415.622.333 RPR Brussel/RPM Bruxelles
ING 310-1381196-02
This legal entity is a member of the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity
|
"Peter
L. Borresen" <plb@ebconnect.dk> 19/03/2010
11:37 |
|
Dear all
The PSC is been given a task of reviewing the
schemas (now there are 50) at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201003/msg00009.html
Therefore I would like to call
in for a PSC meeting Tuesday the 23rd of March 15.00 CET at
STANDING CON CALL NUMBER
Skype: +9900827043982678
US/Canada toll-free:
1-888-350-0075
International:
201-793-9022
"Conference Room
Number": 3982678 then #
(applies only if calling one of the phone numbers)
Agenda:
1) Review
of the schemas
2) Any
other business
I have allowed myself to
distribute some task to the group:
Andy and the TSC:
Review Transport schemas.
Oriol:
Review Tendering schemas
Sven:
Review Catalogue schemas
Martin:
Review Ordering schemas
Peter
(me):
Review Sourcing schemas.
Georg:
Review Billing schemas
Joao:
Review ApplicationResponse, Attachment, DocumentStatus, DocumentStatusRequest
Roberto:
Review RemittanceAdvice, Statement
Ole:
Review Utillity Statement
Arianna:
Review eBiz schemas (Stock Availbillity Report, Instructions for returns,
Invetory report, Product Activity
Fulya:
Review the CPRF schemas (ExceptionCriteria, ExceptinNotification,
ForeCast, ForeCastRequest,
ItemInformationRequest,
ProductActivity, RetailEvent)
PLEASE SEND A NOTIFICATION TO
THE LIST WITH THE RESULT WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE REVIEW
I WOULD LIKE THIS BEFORE
TUEDAY THE 23RD NOON. SORRY FOR THE SHORT TIME LIMIT
*Professional Mail*
*Professional Mail*
*Professional Mail*
*Professional Mail*
*Professional Mail*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.
If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail,
please notify the author by replying to this e-mail. If you are not
the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
rely on this e-mail.
PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails and
other telecommunications on its e-mail and telecommunications systems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus
found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2839 - Release Date: 05/05/10 20:26:00