Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Re: Action item from the Pacific call

[Oriol Bausą Peris <oriol@invinet.org>]

I think we should treat Withholding Tax Total as the current Tax Total, and as the latter does not have a summary element in LegalMonetary Total, we could treat the former the same way
Oriol
 
El 28/03/2011, a las 15:12, Peter L. Borresen escribió:

> Hi Oriol
> 
> Does this imply a summary element in LegalMonetaryTotal?
> 
> /Peter
> 
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Oriol Bausą Peris [mailto:oriol@invinet.org] 
> Sendt: 28. marts 2011 12:19
> Til: Peter Borresen; ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Jon Bosak
> Emne: [ubl-psc] Re: Action item from the Pacific call
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> There is a requirement about withholding taxes we raise some time ago but it
> seems not covered in the current 2.1 invoice data model.
> 
> The requirement is to have a class to identify withholding taxes. 
> 
> Wikipedia:
> "Withholding tax is a government requirement for the payer of an item of
> income to withhold or deduct tax from the payment, and pay that tax to the
> government. In most jurisdictions withholding tax applies to employment
> income."
> 
> As Roberto said, the explanation for this requirement is:
> 
> " is a binding for the invoicee that is required to pay withholding taxes on
> behalf of their consultant (supplier).
> 
> The Invoicee (or Customer) is pratically doing the same like the Employer
> that payes withholding taxes for Employees.
> 
> This is the same concept.
> 
> The invoice it is just used to transport and evidence this information, but
> this is a separated legal issue from VAT or other invoicing things.
> that we is to have document level withholding tax support "
> 
> 
> So the point is that we need an structure to enable carrying withholding
> taxes. 
> 
> I would suggest to create a new ASBIE at header level using the class
> TaxTotal and with a Qualifier called Withholding. The main reason why not
> using the actual TaxTotal ASBIE is to avoid requiring calculations based on
> the values of a codelist, You could argue that we do not need this new
> Withholding_ TaxTotal as this can be achieved by the current TaxTotal with
> the proper TaxScheme/ID, but the point with this approach is that you need
> to create difficult calculation expressions:
> 
> Not summing up taxes if the taxscheme id equals "Withholding taxes".
> Deducting total taxes where taxschemeid equals "Withholding taxes" from the
> Payable Amount.
> 
> Regards
> Oriol
> 
> 
> 
> El 22/03/2011, a las 15:40, Jon Bosak escribió:
> 
>> Peter, Oriol,
>> 
>> Please note this from the minutes:
>> 
>>  PSC (TM): An issue has arisen offline: the Spanish government has a
>>  requirement to describe withholding tax on invoices.
>> 
>>     AGREED that this is a PRD3 issue that the PSC should begin working
>>     on now.
>> 
>>     ACTION: PLB to contact Oriol to get a formal statement of the
>>     requirement.
>> 
>> Jon
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Ingen virus fundet i denne meddelelse.
> Kontrolleret af AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1498/3533 - Udgivelsesdato: 27-03-2011
> 
> 
>