Re: SV: [ubl-psc] Do we need a RFQ submission acceptable date?

[Oriol Bausą Peris <oriol@invinet.org>]

It seems you can fulfill government public procurement with the call for tenders document, where more procedural information can be stated.
Oriol

El 18/04/2011, a las 20:33, G. Ken Holman escribió:

> At 2011-04-18 16:53 +0200, Peter L. Borresen wrote:
>> The start date is the issue date. For this kind of tendering you can't get a
>> quotation too early.
> 
> What do we recommend, then, to users who need both an available and a due date, where the available date is not the issue date?
> 
>   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/201104/msg00002.html
>  "And yes, for government making a public RFQ to commercial businesses
>   there is a kind of 'auction' time available in which they can make
>   their offer and there is a separate start/end for when the offer
>   should be standing."
> 
> Should they be using a different document?  It looked like the rest of the UBL 2.1 document suited this user.
> 
> Thanks for your guidance, Peter!
> 
> . . . . . . . . . Ken
> 
> 
> --
> Contact us for world-wide XML consulting & instructor-led training
> Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
> G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
> Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php