Dear all please find the minutes of the meeting the 3rd
of December 2012
Participants:
Kees Duvekot, Arianna Brutti and Peter Borresen
Agenda:
1)
Review of
definitions, see attachment
Answers for most questions has been given. The definition
excel sheet needs to be filled out more consistently, so it gets more
precise what the actual definition is. Peter and Tim will do the final
editing.
2)
Issues found
during the definition review, see sheet in attachment.
|
Currrent
|
Proposed
change
|
Resolution
|
Supplier Consumption. Description. Text
|
0.1
|
0..n
|
approved
|
Telecommunications Service. Roaming Partner Name. Text
|
Text
|
Change to Name
|
approved
|
Telecommunications Supply. Description. Text
|
0..1
|
0..n
|
approved
|
Utility Item. Subscriber Identifier. Identifier
|
|
remove the IdentifierType and IdentifierTypeCode, use
agentcy instead
|
Change SubscriberIDType to SubscriberType and
SubscriberIDTypeCode to SubscriberTypeCode
|
Budget Amount
|
|
Change name to RequestedTenderTotal
|
approved
|
EvidenceSuppliedID
|
0..1
|
0..n
|
approved
|
ContractExecutionRequirement
|
0..n
|
0..1
|
approved
|
Correction
|
|
change name to ConsumptionCorrection
|
approved
|
Evidence. Name
|
|
Change Name to text
|
approved
|
Evaluation Criteria. _expression_ Code. Code
|
0..n
|
It should be 0..1 and add am _expression_. Text 0..n
|
approved
|
Power Of Attorney. Notary_ Party. Party
|
|
In some states of the U.S., power of attorney requires
either two witnesses or a notary, and in others it requires one witness
and one notary. Perhaps we should add a WitnessParty of 0..n and make
this 0..1?
|
approved
|
Qualification Resolution. Admission Code. Code
|
|
THIS IS AN INDICATOR, NOT A CODE.
|
check with Oriol
|
Regulation. Name
|
1..n
|
1..n names? Shouldn't this be "The name of this
regulation"?
|
approved
|
Tender Requirement. Name
|
0..n
|
The name of this tender requirement. 1
|
approved
|
3)
Request to add
Party role code to Party
Rejected. The Party role is by design applied as
qualification
4)
Issues from
Akara:
- The cardinality of
"/Invoice/cac:OrderReference" is "0..1". In Turkey,
an invoice may refer to multiple orders.
Therefore, the cardinality of
this element should be "0..n".
Rejected. If an invoice apply to more than one orders
then the orderreference should be applied on the line level
- The cardinality of
"/Invoice/cac:WithholdingTaxTotal" and
"/Invoice/cac:InvoiceLine/cac:WithholdingTaxTotal" is "0..1". In
Turkey, an invoice (and its lines) may contain
multiple withholdings.
Therefore, the cardinality of these element
should be "0..n".
Approved
5)
Any other
business
None
Best regards
Peter