[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] Minutes of the] UBL PSC meeting monday the 3rd of December 2012
Hi, folks, At 2012-12-20 16:08 +0100, Oriol Bausà Peris wrote:
El 20/12/2012, a las 12:40, Arianna Brutti escribió:1- about EvidenceSuppliedID and ContractExecutionRequirement: I need to know where the cardinality must be changed;I do not understand why the EvidenceSuppliedID has to be changed to 0..n. The reason for this element is to point to the actual Evidence covering a particular criteria, so it should be one.
I agree that BBIEs that are not prose oriented (e.g. descriptions, notes, instructions) should be 0..1 or 1..1. If there is a requirement for more than one such BBIE, then there should be an ASBIE pointing to an ABIE with the BBIE with 0..1 or 1..1. Such an approach allows for future versions of the standard to associate other information with each of the identifiers that is not conceived of at this early stage. If we leave the BBIE as "0..n" or "1..n", then it is impossible to associate information with each individual BBIE in the future.
I hope this is considered helpful. . . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]