OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-sbsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [ubl-sbsc] What process for a Technical Corrigendum for UBL1.0 SBS 1.0?

Thanks Ken

Just so you know I've seen your posting, though I don't
yet know the process answer. Great that the subset
definition files are not affected - these are the files
pointed to in specs, UBP etc and are as you say the
normative ones so that is good news.

All the best


Quoting "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>:

> Hi guys,
> I've just found a fault in the synthesis of a set of XPath files in 
> the UBL 1.0 SBS 1.0 committee spec deliverable.
> This was discovered in my real-world application of the draft UBL 2.0 
> SBS XPath files here in Denmark ... surprise, surprise.
> There are no changes to the definition of the SBS or the XPath files, 
> just a fault in the generation of the XPath instance files according 
> to the existing definition.  An important enough fault that the XPath 
> instance files are not useful as they stand.  It happens that the 
> XPath description files are not at fault, the fault is in the 
> generation of the instance files from the description files.
> My proposed update to the instance files would not change a single 
> datum of the description files and the description files are the only 
> normative set of files.
> What would be the process of issuing a technical corrigendum UBL 1.0 
> SBS 1.0.1?
> . . . . . . . . . . Ken

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]