[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: UBL Profile for XML Digital Signatures and XAdES implementation
See inline my comments on yours. Andrea Il giorno 29/nov/2009, alle ore 13.16, JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino ha scritto:
[AC] I like your proposal to use cac:Signature/cbc:ID <--> ext:UBLExtensions/ext:UBLExtension/cbc:ID because this way we better decouple the signature from the UBL document. In future, in case we are asked to do so, we will be able to define new profiles with other signature formats in the extensions using the same mechanism, defining new URIs for cbc:SignatureMethod.
[AC] ok [AC] I changed opinion on this. The fact that the invoice need a mention that is issued on behalf of the seller is not always related to the the signature and of course we are not only signing invoices. So this issue is in fact out of the scope of this SC while I think this field can be used to hold any normative reference relevant for the issuer of the document. This text is only for information purpose to be used only for human readable versions of the document
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]