[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-security] Question about the Dsig Profile as a separate deliverable
... I hope the HTML or PDF of the whole UBL 2.1 specification will not hang my browser... or the PDF reader. Can we virtually have a unique specification and phisically splitted sections ? Let's think baout the usability as I often had troubles while playing such long documents. It is not clearly an issue generated by the dimension of our specifications... but tools are not well designed all the time :-) Take care Roberto > It appears that we're all agreed to incorporate the Dsig profile into > the main UBL 2.1 deliverable. Ken Holman has kindly agreed to take the > first pass at this reorganization. Many thanks to the Security SC for > its work in making this possible! > > Jon > > Roberto Cisternino wrote: >> +1 >> >> I agree too. >> >>> I agree. Our work was meant also as a best practice for implementing an >>> UBL extension and this can be better emphasized within UBL 2.1 spec. >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> Il giorno 19/nov/2011, alle ore 11:20, Oriol Bausà Peris ha scritto: >>> >>>> Hi Jon, >>>> >>>> I think that incorporating it into the UBL 2.1 spec itself would be >>>> the >>>> best option >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Oriol Bausà >>>> >>>> El 18/11/2011, a las 18:17, Jon Bosak escribió: >>>> >>>>> Hello UBL Security Subcommittee, >>>>> >>>>> As we begin to finish UBL 2.1, an editorial question has arisen with >>>>> regard to the Digital Signature Profile that you produced last year. >>>>> >>>>> In the first two public review cycles, the Profile, formatted as an >>>>> independent specification, has been included in the review package >>>>> (in >>>>> the doc subdirectory). But from an editorial point of view, it would >>>>> be >>>>> better either to publish the Profile as a separate deliverable (i.e., >>>>> make it a Committee Specification) or to incorporate the material >>>>> into >>>>> the UBL 2.1 specification itself. Incorporating it into the main UBL >>>>> 2.1 document would make relevant information easier to find. >>>>> >>>>> Before we come to a decision on this, we need to know whether members >>>>> of >>>>> the Security Subcommittee have an opinion regarding the need to >>>>> publish >>>>> the Profile as a separate document. If there is such a need, then of >>>>> course that will decide the issue. >>>>> >>>>> Please consider this question and let us know what you think. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Jon Bosak >>>>> Chair, OASIS UBL TC > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-security-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-security-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > -- * JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino * * Document Engineering Services Ltd. - Alliance Member * UBL Italian Localization SubCommittee (ITLSC), co-Chair * UBL Online Community editorial board member (ubl.xml.org) * Italian UBL Advisor Roberto Cisternino mobile: +39 328 2148123 skype: roberto.cisternino.ubl-itlsc [UBL Technical Committee] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl [UBL Online Community] http://ubl.xml.org [UBL International Conferences] http://www.ublconference.org [UBL Italian Localization Subcommittee] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl-itlsc [Iniziativa divulgativa UBL Italia] http://www.ubl-italia.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]